<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A case against tabbed browsing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rassie.org/archives/172/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rassie.org/archives/172</link>
	<description>Barking at technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rassie&#8217;s Doghouse &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Webkit on Windows Mobile</title>
		<link>http://rassie.org/archives/172/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Rassie&#8217;s Doghouse &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Webkit on Windows Mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rassie.org/archives/172#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] (Opera mini and iPhone&#8217;s browser) &#8212; the real challenge is not having some useless tab browsing, it&#8217;s about making your user happy by making him control his browser less, since that&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] (Opera mini and iPhone&#8217;s browser) &#8212; the real challenge is not having some useless tab browsing, it&#8217;s about making your user happy by making him control his browser less, since that&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://rassie.org/archives/172/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rassie.org/archives/172#comment-17</guid>
		<description>The question naturally arises why you should use tabbed browsing if you don&#039;t like it...
Personally I find it darn convenient. And even though I use xmonad and enjoy the hell out of it, I haven&#039;t found out yet how xmonad could handle my webbrowsing without tabs and without cluttering my screens.
I am open for any suggestions.

Still, I interpret the &quot;one application - one task&quot; philosophy differently: the web is what I read. If I stumble upon interesting links I open a new tab. If I want to write mail I open my mailclient. If I want to waste time in an online community I open irssi. If I want to watch a video I open mplayer or vlc. If I want to sort my photos I open digiKam. If I want to write I open vim.... You see my point? I have a fast computer with plenty of disk-space, there are thousands of wonderful apps out there... why should I spend great effort into customizing my system so that it works well together with some web-applications? They tend to lack essential features, are not customizable, horribly slow, have the most creepy terms-of-use and are above all unreliable as hell. You might be right, tabbed browsing might not be ideal for this whole web two-zero idea. But frankly, it&#039;s the web which is crap, not the browsing....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question naturally arises why you should use tabbed browsing if you don&#8217;t like it&#8230;
Personally I find it darn convenient. And even though I use xmonad and enjoy the hell out of it, I haven&#8217;t found out yet how xmonad could handle my webbrowsing without tabs and without cluttering my screens.
I am open for any suggestions.</p>

<p>Still, I interpret the &#8220;one application - one task&#8221; philosophy differently: the web is what I read. If I stumble upon interesting links I open a new tab. If I want to write mail I open my mailclient. If I want to waste time in an online community I open irssi. If I want to watch a video I open mplayer or vlc. If I want to sort my photos I open digiKam. If I want to write I open vim&#8230;. You see my point? I have a fast computer with plenty of disk-space, there are thousands of wonderful apps out there&#8230; why should I spend great effort into customizing my system so that it works well together with some web-applications? They tend to lack essential features, are not customizable, horribly slow, have the most creepy terms-of-use and are above all unreliable as hell. You might be right, tabbed browsing might not be ideal for this whole web two-zero idea. But frankly, it&#8217;s the web which is crap, not the browsing&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
